5 February 2026

“The Great Mouse Detective” (1986)

The Great Mouse Detective 


Also known as: Basil the Great Mouse Detective; The Adventures of the Great Mouse Detective


Brief Description:

Basil of Baker Street undertakes to help a young mouse find and save her father from the criminal mastermind Professor Ratigan.

(from Wikipedia)


Date: 1986

Genre: American animated mystery adventure film

Running time: 1 hour 14 minutes


Cast: 

Vincent Price: Ratigan

Barrie Ingham: Basil/Bartholomew

Val Bettin: Dr. Dawson/thug guard

Susanne Pollatschek: Olivia

Candy Candido: Fidget/reprobate in the pub

Diana Chesney: Mrs. Judson

Eve Brenner: Mouse Queen

Alan Young: Mr. Flaversham

Basil Rathbone: Sherlock Holmes

Laurie Main: Dr. Watson

Wayne Allwine, Tony Anselmo, Walker Edmiston: Ratigan's thug guards

Melissa Manchester: Miss Mouse


Director: John Musker, Ron Clements, Dave Michener, & Burny Mattinson

Production company: Walt Disney Feature Animation


Based on: The Basil of Baker Street Series by Eve Titus & Paul Galdone


Wikipedia page


Watch on Archive



Setting/Aesthetic/Feel: 5/5

I love the classic Sherlock Holmes London vibes of this film! It's so deliciously creepy and gloomy. There's still a Disney atmosphere with the couple of party/musical scenes, but overall it feels pretty mysterious.


Characters: 5/5

Ratigan is so over-the-top and not very Moriarty at all, but he's fun to hate. Basil is perfect—he's so Sherlocky, right down to his eccentricity and little running commentary. Olivia is adorable; Dawson, while way stupider than the real Watson, is stereotypically film Watson and a great sidekick. Fidget is awful but also fun to hate; and Miss Mouse fascinates me (someone needs to write her story, and also, I confuse her terribly with Red from Tom & Jerry Meet Sherlock Holmes). 


Plot: 4/5

It's extremely fast-paced, with sweet, sad, funny, and anxious moments. Some of my siblings found it too much, others enjoyed it. I've always enjoyed it, no matter how often I watch it! So much of the story parodies Sherlock Holmes stories, and the Big Ben fight is iconic.


Content: 3/5 (medium)

In a kids' film, I'm not the biggest fan of the musical scene in the beginning where the thugs are drunk and champagne flows, but I suspect most kids wouldn't know what's up and it is accurate. However, there's a scene further in the film where Miss Mouse sings, which is much more adult. It takes place in a tavern, and she dances (can-can?) with a couple other girls while singing a song about "let your baby be good to you," dresses in a garter and bodysuit. All the guys are obsessed, naturally; meanwhile, someone tries to drug Basil & Dawson's beer. This scene can be skipped, though you miss a bit of the storyline. 


Violence: 3/5 (medium) 

Some physical violence, including Ratigan feeding one of his mice to his cat. 


Overall: 4.5/5

I love it, and it's honestly a real comfort film for me. It's funny, sweet, mysterious, and Londony—what's not to love?! 

“A Little Princess” (1986–1987)

A Little Princess 


Brief Description:

Sara Crewe enters a London boarding school a wealthy lady when she bids her father farewell as he enters the British Army, but her lifestyle quickly vanishes when her father suddenly dies, and Sara must endure a life of servitude.


Date: 1986–1987

Genre: British-American period drama adapatation

Running time: 2 hours 43 minutes


Cast: 

Maureen Lipman as Miss Minchin

Amelia Shankley as Sara Crewe

Miriam Margolyes as Miss Amelia Minchin

Annette Badland as Cook

Natalie Abbott as Becky

Alison Reynolds as Ermengarde

Katrina Heath as Lavinia

Joanna Dukes as Jessie

Johanna Hargreaves as Henrietta

Jessica Simpson as Lottie

Nigel Havers as Carrisford

David Yelland as Ralph Crewe

John Bird as Mr Carmichael

Annie Lambert as Mrs Carmichael

Antony Zaki as Ram Dass

Meera Syal as Anna


Director: Carol Wiseman

Production company: LWT


Based on: A Little Princess by Frances Hodgson Burnett


Wikipedia page


Watch on Archive

(watched on Tubi)



Setting/Aesthetic/Feel: 3.5/5

I grew up reading and rereading (and copying down) A Little Princess, so I am a tough critic. I think the book got the setting pretty well. I don't think it did very well getting the feel/vibe of the book, and I personally think the filming is terrible (everything is so yellow?!). 


Characters: 3.5/5

While the characters are somewhat accurate to the book's portrayal, they become their own new thing. Sara is not a storyteller, for example, and seems more 14 than 12. Ermengarde isn't bad, but Lottie isn't much herself, and Becky's more of a comic side character than the sweet, pathetic book character. Miss Minchin is both worse and better than she is in the book, at alternate times, and Miss Amelia is much more sympathetic, while the cook is horrid (accurate, but so grating!). Ram Das is fun, if wholly redone; Captain Crewe is horrid (way too old); the Carmichaels are pretty good, though the father's a bit too old; Lavinia & Jessie are both worse and dumber (Jessie is much less nice than she is in the book); and the Aya is a whole new invention. I was really confused by her position in the Crewe household—she seemed to be almost the mother/wife figure, and Captain Crewe treated her more like he owed an account to than a servant. 


Plot: 4/5

The plot follows the book's plot somewhat. Obviously it condenses/removes some things and other it stretches out into a whole new thing, which I suppose is to be expected. I felt it really skimped on the message/feel of the book and just delivered a drama instead of a sweet, encouraging story. At certain points it got harder to handle because of the injustice and cruelty, which is easier to read than to see. 


Theme/Message/Topics: 2/5

Literally none, unless it's be kind because you don't know when you'll need the kindness of others... 


Content: 1/5 (low)

A mention of "magic" and "magicians" when Sara tries to figure out how her room got redone; a few liberties of the imagination about heaven. 


Violence: 2/5 (low)

Mild violence (slapping); mild verbal violence; a scene where the girls twist Ermengarde's arm behind her back until she says mean things about Sara.


Overall: 3.5/5

It's not the worst thing ever, but to be honest I don't think I'll be rewatching it simply because it's so long and I don't like it enough to spend all that time on it. My little sisters liked it though.  

“Dragonwyck” (1946)

Dragonwyck


Brief Description:

A simple Connecticut farm girl is recruited by a distant relative, an aristocratic patroon, to be governess to his young daughter in his Hudson Valley mansion. 

(from IMDb)


Date: 1946

Genre: American period drama adaptation 

Running time: 1 hour 43 minutes


Cast: 

Gene Tierney as Miranda Wells

Vincent Price as Nicholas van Ryn

Walter Huston as Ephraim Wells

Glenn Langan as Dr. Jeff Turner

Anne Revere as Abigail Wells

Spring Byington as Magda

Connie Marshall as Katrine Van Ryn

Harry Morgan as Bleecker

Jessica Tandy as Peggy

Vivienne Osborne as Johanna Van Ryn

Trudy Marshall as Elizabeth Van Borden

Larry Steers as Servant

Grady Sutton as Hotel Clerk


Director: Joseph L. Mankiewicz

Production company: 20th Century-Fox


Based on: Dragonwyck by Anya Seton


Wikipedia page


Watch on Archive



Setting/Aesthetic/Feel: 5/5

I originally watched this just after watching Rebecca and totally fell in love because it was very similar in vibe/aesthetic. I've never heard of the Hudson River patroons before, so I enjoyed that part of the setting immensely. Of course I also really enjoyed the luxurious setting of Dragonwyck and the gorgeous period dresses 😉 


Characters: 4/5

Miranda was a sweet, brave girl and I appreciated her faith. (Also, Gene Tierney reminds me insanely of Katherine Hepburn somehow?!) Nicholas reminded me of Max DeWinter from Rebecca at first, but he quickly disintegrated. Jeff was a much nicer fellow, naturally, and Katrine was cute, though I wasn't a fan of Johanna. Ephraim Wells frustrated me terribly at the beginning of the film, but towards the end I understood and appreciated him and his wife a little (little) bit more, though I still did not like his high-handed ways and roughshod Christianity.  


Plot: 4/5

I watched this film twice, and didn't remember much of it the second time I did. It's very romantic, with a backwoods country girl moving into the rich aristocrats' world and finding herself well out of her depth, while two handsome men interested in her. The story quickly progresses into drama, then tragedy, but ends with a note of hope. I liked it so much the first time—I was rather indifferent this time—so I think I need to try it a third time lol. 


Romance: 4/5

Obviously Nicolas' and Miranda's love is dangerous in the sense that he's clearly a terrible fellow for her to marry, but Miranda handles it well and I think that whole storyline does well as a message. I also wasn't a fan of the one or two insinuations that he fell in love with her while still married, but nothing happened and she certainly did not encourage him or even seem to realize what was happening. 


Theme/Message/Topics: /5

The storyline of Nicolas' passion of remaining in his ancestral land, and refusing to sell it to the tenants who farmed it for generations and more than paid for it, was very interesting. For a while I was on his side, because I couldn't see why they were any more right than he was... it gave me a lot to think of. It also reminded me a lot of the French Revolution... 

Anyways, I was a huge fan of the pro-life message as Miranda fights for her crippled maid and then her son.


Content: 4/5 (low)

A few kisses; a few low-necked dresses; a main character is revealed to be a drug addict; a ghost ancestor haunts the Van Ryn house and sings when a death comes to the household. Also Ephraim Wells is borderline verbally/spiritually abusive in a few scenes. 


Violence: 4/5 (low)

Attempted stabbing; murder; attempted murder; a man is shot + killed in self-defence. 


Overall: 4/5

It's a melodrama, but I like it. Again, it reminds me of Rebecca, though not as good, and I'd like to try the novel. 

31 January 2026

“The Prince & the Pauper” (1996)

The Prince & the Pauper


Brief Description:

In this adaptation of Mark Twain's classic tale, a street urchin and a prince in Tudor England swap places to learn how the other half lives.


Date: 1996

Genre: British television period drama serial adaptation

Running time: 2 hours 51 minutes


Cast: 

Philip Sarson: Tom Canty/Prince Edward

John Bowe: The Duke of Somerset

Peter Jeffrey: The Duke of Norfolk

Elizabeth Ann O'Brien: Lady Elizabeth

Richenda Carey: Lady Milford

Rupert Frazer: Sir Thomas Seymour

Douglas Reith: Chamberlain

James Purefoy: Miles Hendon

John Judd: John Canty

Virginia Beare: Lady Mary

Max Johnson: Humphrey Marlow

Jenny McCracken: Mother Canty

Sophia Myles: Lady Jane Grey

Lucy Speed: Nan Canty

Paul Chapman: Father Thomas

Freddy White: Hugo

Janet Henfrey: Goody Watson

Keith Michell: King Henry VIII

Miranda Forbes: Widow White

Nick Smallman: Sir Hugh Hendon

Victoria Gay: Lady Edith de Bohun


Director: Andrew Morgan

Production company: BBC


Based on: The Prince & the Pauper by Mark Twain


IMDb page


Watched on Tubi



Setting/Aesthetic/Feel: 5/5

Excellent! I felt completely transported to Tudor England, specifically in the costumes department. I thought the language was rather simplistic and not at all medieval—certainly not like Twain wrote it—but it didn't bother me. 


Characters: 4/5

Miles was perfect, so perfect. 💙 I think Tom & Edward were both fairly accurate, though neither fully as the book presented them (specially Tom). Elizabeth & Mary were well done; I liked the dukes and duchesses—except for the Seymour brothers, who were quite different from the book and much more intense, specifically Hartford. The Canty family was well done, and Father Thomas was awesome. Hugh was terrible, of course, and Edith pretty perfect :)  


Plot: 4/5

The plot only followed the book's plot about 50%, which left me wondering what would happen a lot more than I expected to. I didn't necessarily mind it, it just wasn't what I expected. I enjoyed the added political drama, which Twain really didn't go into at all.  


Romance: 5/5

Except for the Seymour brothers trying to force Elizabeth to marry the youngest brother, there was no romance besides Miles & Edith, who shared 1 kiss. 


Theme/Message/Topics: 4/5

There wasn't a huge theme, but like in the book, Edward learned to apply mercy in justice. 


Content: 4/5 (low)

Maybe a handful of exclamations of "l*rd"? I can't recall, honestly. All I remember for content is a few shots of people drinking and a scene where Miles's shirt is half off when he wakes up. 


Violence: 4/5 (low)

Still violent, like the book, but not over the top. Not really family-friendly though, especially a scene where two baptist women are burned at the stake (non-detailed). 


Overall: 4.5/5

Overall I really enjoyed watching this show and I'm sad Tubi took it off because I'd love to rewatch it. Makes me want to write a P&tP retelling 😉 

23 January 2026

“Pride & Prejudice” (1995)

Pride & Prejudice 

Brief Description:

While the arrival of wealthy gentlemen sends her marriage-minded mother into a frenzy, willful and opinionated Elizabeth Bennet matches wits with haughty Mr. Darcy.

(from IMDb—terrible blurb btw) 


Date: 1995

Genre: British television period drama serial adaptation

Running time: 5 hours 45 minutes 


Cast: 

Jennifer Ehle: Elizabeth

Colin Firth: Darcy

Adrian Lukis: Wickham

Alison Steadman: Mrs. Bennet

Benjamin Whitrow: Mr. Bennet

David Bamber: Mr. Collins

Susannah Harker: Jane

Julia Sawalha: Lydia

Polly Maberly: Kitty

Lucy Briers: Mary

Crispin Bonham-Carter: Bingley

Lucy Scott: Charlotte

Anna Chancellor: Miss Bingley

Lucy Robinson: Mrs. Hurst

Barbara Leigh-Hunt: Lady Catherine de Bourgh

Anthony Calf: Colonel Fitzwilliam

Joanna David: Mrs. Gardiner

Tim Wylton: Mr. Gardiner

Emilia Fox: Georgiana

Bridget Turner: Mrs. Reynolds

David Bark-Jones: Denny

Lynn Farleigh: Mrs. Phillips

Lucy Davis: Maria Lucas

Christopher Benjamin: Sir William Lucas

Rupert Vansittart: Mr. Hurst

Marlene Sidaway: Hill

Paul Moriarty: Colonel Forster

Victoria Hamilton: Mrs. Forster


Director: Simon Langton

Production company: BBC


Based on: Pride & Prejudice by Jane Austen


Wikipedia page


Watch on Archive

(watched on Tubi)



Setting/Aesthetic/Feel: 5/5

Y'all, the first thing I noticed in this adaptation was how beautiful it was! We all know what a huge fan I am of the beauty in “Pride & Prejudice” (2005). While this definitely didn't have the same grandiose feel, it was still lovely and—to be honest—much more accurate. I loved the Bennets' house and the gorgeous English countryside... Also, the costumes and hairstyling felt/looked very accurate too, though I can't speak much to that since I'm not anything like an expert when it comes to historically accurate clothes. 😆 


Characters: 5/5

Ugh, the casting here was awesome. Elizabeth is perfect—PERFECT! I love how Kiera Knightley does Lizzie, but I think Jennifer Ehle captured her more as she probably was in Austen's mind. While I don't find him really handsome (sorry!) Firth has Darcy's attitude and atmosphere perfectly down. I like how he captured more of the pride than the 2005 film showed. Jane was perfection (and so gorgeous, my word. Jennifer Ehle and Susannah Harker are both so pretty). The Bennets, in short, were excellent, as were all the Bingleys and Hursts. Pretty much everyone here is awesome, except for Wickham, who is also not handsome enough; but he does have the attitude down well, though, so I accept it. Also, I enjoyed seeing the Fosters, to be honest.


Plot: 5/5

This show being double the length of the film, it obviously has room for a LOT more of the plot, and does a very good job, in my opinion. There are few bits that are tweaked, and not terribly much, either. The dialogue was also pretty accurate. 


Romance: 5/5

While P&P isn't my favourite romance ever, I love the fact that every time I read or watch this story, I always forget when and how Darcy & Lizzy get together. Also, I love that in this show there is only one kiss—and that following their marriage 😉 There are a few scenes of Lydia & Wickham together in a one-bed hotel room in episodes 5 & 6, kinda snuggly, with Lydia in her nightclothes; by E6, however, they are married. 


Theme/Message/Topics: 5/5

I felt like this movie makes a much bigger deal of Lydia's whole situation, and what a warning it is—also of how important marriage is. 


Content: 3/5 (medium)

Frequent uses of "l*rd," "good G**," "d*m*," and "for G**'s sake." Many low-necked dresses, some worse than others. Drinking; a few scenes where people are drunk. A few scenes where the Bennet girls are in nightgowns, sometimes partly wrapped in shawls, sometimes in more low-necked/flimsy nightgowns, depending. In E1, there's a short scene where Darcy bathes (you never see more than his bare shoulders, but I skip it). In E2, there's a scene where Lydia runs around the upstairs of her house in her low-necked slip and meets Mr. Collins, who hides his face from her. In E3, there's a tiny scene where Wickham has a woman in underclothes on his knee; and Darcy goes swimming, traipsing around in a wet and clingy white shirt for a scene afterwards. In E6, the minister talks about how marriage is to "avoid fornication" and not to be entered in "to satisfy men's lusts."


Overall: 5/5

Overall, this is rather more accurate, which I really love, but I still enjoy the 2005 film and I would happily watch each back to back. 

14 January 2026

“Great Expectations” (1999)

Great Expectations

Brief Description:

A young boy called Pip stumbles upon a hunted criminal who threatens him and demands food. A few years later, Pip finds that he has a benefactor. Imagining that Miss Havisham, a rich lady whose adopted daughter Estella he loves, is the benefactor, Pip believes in a grand plan at the end of which he will be married to Estella...

(from Wikipedia)


Date: 1999

Genre: period drama television serial adaptation

Running time: 2 hours 48 minutes (2 episodes)


Cast: 

Ioan Gruffudd: Pip

Gabriel ThomsonYoung Pip

Justine WaddellEstella

Gemma GregoryYoung Estella

Emma CunniffeBiddy

Laura AikmanYoung Biddy

Charlotte RamplingMiss Havisham

Bernard HillMagwitch

Clive RussellJoe

Lesley Sharp: Mrs. Joe

Ian McDiarmidJaggers

Laila MorseMolly

Daniel EvansHerbert Pocket

Laurence DobieszYoung Herbert

James HillierBentley Drummle

Tony Curran: Orlick

Nicholas Woodeson: Wemmick


Director: Julian Jarrold

Production company: BBC Worldwide & WGBH


Based on: Great Expectations by Charles Dickens


Wikipedia page


Watched on Tubi


Setting/Aesthetic/Feel: 5/5

I had my eye on this and finally watched it because Tubi was about to take it away (same as Tenant of Wildfell Hall, haha). I'm so glad I did, because I loved it! The setting and aesthetic was so beautiful and felt very accurate—I loved the victorian dresses, of course. Satis House was perfect, and I loved the scenery around Pip's house. The soundtrack was good too!


Characters: 5/5

Pip was perfect. Young Pip and Older Pip—perfect. Gruffudd looked and acted like Pip. I loved it. Justine Waddell didn't fit my idea of Estella at all, but she was very pretty and I enjoyed her acting. Russell was basically perfect as Joe; and Lesley Sharp was the PERFECT Mrs. Joe—I never realized what a horrid person she was, though I've read the book so often. Emma Cunniffe as Biddy was awesome; Miss Havisham (Charlotte Rampling) was somehow horribly young and horribly old—excellent; and Magwitch (Hill) made my skin crawl at first, and then made me so terribly sad... just like in the book. Evans as Herbert was awesomeeee and though I don't remember Drummle well, Hillier made me hate him as much as I should. The only cast problem I really had was McDiarmid as Jaggers—so, so wrong. He had Jaggers' personality, somewhat, but really didn't look or act like the man. And Woodeson was not a very good Wemmick. But Curran was the perfect Orlick. Ugh. 


Plot: 5/5

I have read the book many times, so I'm fairly familiar with the plot. I was delighted by how close they stuck to it! Naturally they had to pick and choose their scenes, but they did so well. The only added scene I disliked was when Pip got drunk at the ball, fought with Estella, and insulted Drummle, which I don't recall happening...? I think there was another added scene I wasn't a fan of because it was confrontational but I forget it. They changed the ending a bit, so it was pretty open-ended (clever) and they may have added a couple more confrontational scenes, but overall it was very accurate and I loved that they even added Wemmick's romance. 


Theme/Message/Topics: 5/5

Like the book, this film highlights that women can be domestic abusers as well as men can. And I love how like the book, it also highlight that revenge hurts no one more than oneself and you often fall in the pit you dug for someone else. Also, it brought back to mind the importance of not living above your means 😆 


Romance: 5/5

Since Pip & Estella don't officially get together, there's not a very strong romance line; but Herbert & Clara are cute—the little you see of them, haha. There is only 1 cheek kiss between Estella & Pip as children; I can't recall anything else. 


Content: 4/5

Take note a few ball dresses were fairly low, and Miss Havisham's consistent dress certainly was, though I only noticed it once or twice because she was not the centre of interest at all, haha/ There's some drinking, probably some smoking; maybe language, though I can't recall any right now. The one thing that takes off a point is after the fire scene, where Miss Havisham is burned, they show Pip's badly burned hands and it was horrific


Violence

2 scenes where Estella's face is bruised and red, as Drummle physically abuses her; an early on scene where Magwitch terrorizes Pip but does nothing; a fistfight between boys; physical and verbal abuse by Mrs. Joe towards Joe and Pip. 


Overall: 5/5

Overall, this was fantastic and I want to rewatch it again asap! It would probably be considered heavy; I personally don't have a problem with it. :) 

“The Tenant of Wildfell Hall” (1996)

The Tenant of Wildfell Hall

Brief Description:

A mysterious young woman arrives at Wildfell Hall, an old house of the Elizabethan era, with a young son. She is determined to lead an independent existence, but her new neighbours do not want to leave her alone. Only one of them, a young farmer, Gilbert Markham, succeeds in finding her secrets.

(from Wikipedia)


Date: 1996

Genre: period drama television serial adaptation

Running time: 2 hours 42 minutes (3 episodes)


Cast: 

Toby Stephens – Gilbert Markham

Tara Fitzgerald – Helen Graham Huntingdon

Rupert Graves – Arthur Huntington

Sarah Badel – Rachel

Jackson Leach – Arthur Huntington Jr.

Sean Gallagher – Walter Hargrave

Jonathan Cake – Ralph Hattersley

Joe Absolom – Fergus Markham

Kenneth Cranham – Reverend Millward

Pam Ferris – Mrs. Markham

Cathy Murphy – Miss Myers

Paloma Baeza – Rose Markham

Aran Bell – Richard Wilson

Miranda Pleasence – Eliza Millward

James Purefoy – Frederick Lawrence

Kim Durham – Benson

Dominic Rowan – Lord Lowborough

Beatie Edney – Annabella Wilmot, Lady Lowborough

Janet Dale – Mrs. Wilson

Susannah Wise – Millicent Hargrave

Karen Westwood – Jane Wilson


Director: Mike Barker

Production company: BBC & WGBH


Based on: The Tenant of Wildfell Hall by Anne Brontë


Wikipedia page


Watch on Archive

(watched on Tubi)


Setting/Aesthetic/Feel: 4/5

I'm just a beginner when it comes to period dramas, so I don't have very much to compare this to. I was not a fan of the vocalizing in the beginning and the end, which felt super modern; but I was very impressed by the clothes and hairstyles, which looked pretty accurate to me. Of course I also loved the aesthetics and settings... overall, I was pretty satisfied. I loved the dresses, anyways 😉 


Characters: 5/5

Judging purely off of looks: I think Tara Fitzgerald was a pretty good Helen. It's been a while since I read the book (only did so once) but I really liked how innocent and sweet her face looked. Graves was not as handsome as I thought Huntingdon would look, but I have no other quibbles. Stephens was a FANTASTIC Gilbert, I thought—looked like him and talked like him. And little Arthur was just cute :)


Plot: 4/5

I have mixed feelings on the plot. While they stuck pretty well to the actual story (as far as I recall; as I said, I only read the book once) they did snuck some extra themes in and remove the christianity. More on that later! It was, as expected, heavy and a little violent, dealing as it does with domestic violence and adultery; and I HATED the minister (I can't recall if I did in the book, or if this was exaggerated in the story). I did enjoy the however-will-they-get-together aspect again, anyways. 


Theme/Message/Topics: 4/5

While Huntingdon still complains bitterly of Helen's morality, and she does object to his vices, it came across as more of a "she's just a good person" and much less "the power of Christ in her." She never explained why she chose to do these things, as she does in the book, nor ever discussed salvation with him (again, like the book) though he does complain of going to hell. The other theme they worked in was much more domestic violence. I can't recall how much physical violence is hinted at or plays on-screen in the book, but in this film Huntingdon is much more verbally and even occasionally physically abusive, and there's rarely a scene where he isn't screaming at Helen once they're married. They also added a good bit of sexual assault. I would have preferred to see it implied and not played out; but I understand it's something important to talk about and probably happened in the book, and it's certainly a part of domestic violence. 


Romance: 2/5 (high)

As mentioned before, there are several scenes of Huntingdon forcing himself on Helen in episode 2. 1 scene happens in bed; in another, he throws her to the floor in a room; and then there are multiple scenes where he forces a kiss. There's also a scene where a friend of his forces kisses on her in episode 3. In episode 2, as well, you get a very wet kiss scene between Huntingdon and Helen before they're married. Later, after the wedding, comes a scene where he kisses her bare stomach and begins to undress her while talking of her beauty, immediately following which comes a scene where they're in bed together, quite bare, discussing how Huntingdon slept with a married woman. Later on, still in episode 2, there's a somewhat graphic birthing scene. Finally, in episode 2 or 3 (I forget) there's a scene where Huntingdon makes out with a friend's wife, but the camera pans quickly enough that all you see is them kissing and him shoving her to the wall (you can hear a few sounds for a few seconds after). Personally, I'm not sure if episode 2 is absolutely necessary to watch as I already know the plot of the book; but definitely if I rewatch it I would skip several scenes. Not just fast-forward, but actually physically skip. 😆 There's 2 kisses between Gilbert and Helen (episodes 1&3) but they're not very intense. 


Content: 2/5 (high)

Apart from everything else mentioned, there's a lot of drinking and drunk people, possible 2-3 instances of swearing; and a very nasty preacher who in one scene preaches a violent sermon, implied to be against Helen, as the townsfolk are convinced she's having an affair. (Spoiler: the man who visits her at bight is her brother, and Helen is not one bit unfaithful.) Huntingdon wishes she was having an affair later on. He becomes ill in episode 3 and coughs blood; his eye bleeds in a certain shot. In another scene, he paints blood from a dead bird on his son and sends him to see Helen; Arthur Jr. then sees a canary in a cage and for one scene hurts it (the bird is seen dead shortly after).


Violence: 2/5 (medium)

Apart from everything else mentioned, there's a scene where Gilbert fights Helen's brother and cuts him about the face with a riding crop; also a scene where one of Huntingdon's friends starts to get physically abusive with his wife but Helen speaks up and the men ask him to stop, which he does. 


Overall: 4/5

Overall, it's definitely for ages 18+ and not to be watched lightly, which I already suspected. As I mentioned, I'd skip some scenes, but I think I'd watch this again. I did enjoy a lot of it and it certainly makes me want to reread the book, which is totally fantastic. (You can read my review of that here.)