Showing posts with label 1960s. Show all posts
Showing posts with label 1960s. Show all posts

21 March 2026

“One Hundred & One Dalmatians” (1961)

One Hundred & One Dalmatians

Also Known As: 101 Dalmatians


Brief Description:

When a litter of Dalmatian puppies are abducted by the minions of Cruella De Vil, the owners must find them before she uses them for a diabolical fashion statement.


Date: 1961

Genre: American animated adventure comedy film

Running Time: 1 hour 19 minutes


Cast: 

Rod Taylor (Pongo)

J. Pat O'Malley (Colonel/Jasper/Mechanic)

Betty Lou Gerson (Cruella De Vil/Miss Birdwell)

Martha Wentworth (Nanny/Queenie/Lucy)

Ben Wright (Roger Radcliffe/Man)

Cate Bauer (Perdita)

David Frankham (Sgt. Tibbs)

Frederick Worlock (Horace/Inspector Graves)

Lisa Davis (Anita Radcliffe)

Tom Conway (Quizmaster/Collie)

Tudor Owen (Towser/Percival Fauncewater)

George Pelling (Danny)

Ramsay Hill (Television Announcer/Labrador)

Sylvia Marriott (Countess)

Queenie Leonard (Princess)

Marjorie Bennett (Duchess)

Mickey Maga (Patch)

Barbara Beaird (Rolly)

Mimi Gibson (Lucky)

Sandra Abbott (Penny)

Thurl Ravenscroft (Captain)

Bill Lee (Roger Radcliffe's singing voice)

Max Smith (Pongo's barks)

Bob Stevens (Narrator)

Paul Wexler (Car Mechanic)

Mary Wickes (Freckles)

Barbara Luddy (Rover)

Lisa Daniels (Perdita)

Helene Stanley (Poodle dog owner)

Don Barclay (Truck Driver)

Dal McKennon (Barking Dogs)

Jeanne Bruns (Radio Singer)


Director: Wolfgang Reitherman, Hamilton Luske, & Clyde Geronimi

Production/Distribution Company: Walt Disney Productions & Buena Vista Distribution


Based On: The Hundred & One Dalmatians by Dodie Smith


Wikipedia Page


Watch on Archive


Setting/Aesthetic/Feel: 4/5

Aw, I love the 1950s London aesthetic!! Also, the snowstorm made me more incredibly sad than I've felt for characters in a long time. Also, the marriage scene is GORGEOUS.


Characters: 4/5

Roger, though he shows spine when Cruella shows up, wasn't my favourite. Anita's sweet though, like Perdita. Pongo was definitely my fav, and I enjoyed meeting all the other animals—dogs, cats, and cows. 😉 Naturally, the villains are awful; but Nanny is fun! 


Plot: 4/5

Nice and exciting! Even though I'd already seen the film once and read the books several times, I was still excited by the chase and watched anxiously for the dogs to get home. Also, the scene where they almost lose a newborn pup and Roger keeps it alive was so surprisingly sweet and poignant 💙 


Romance: 4/5

Cute :) 


Content: 4/5 (low)

Smoking—I can't think of anything else. 


Violence: 4/5 (low)

Cruella wants to kill the dogs; Nanny gets knocked around. 


Overall: 4/5

Overall, this was a fun little vintagey Disney film that I quite enjoyed! 

30 April 2023

“Sherlock Holmes & the Deadly Necklace” (1962)

Sherlock Holmes & the Deadly Necklace


Also known as Sherlock Holmes & das Halsband des Todes


Brief Description:

Sherlock Holmes and Watson do battle with their nemesis, Professor Moriarty, over an ancient necklace attributed to Cleopatra.

(from IMDb)


Date: 1962

Genre: British crime drama mystery 

Running time: 1 hour 25 min


Cast: 

Christopher Lee (Sherlock Holmes)

Thorley Walters (Dr. Watson)

Senta Berger (Ellen Blackburn)

Hans Söhnker (Prof. Moriarty)

Hans Nielsen (Inspector Cooper)

Ivan Desny (Paul King)

Leon Askin (Charles)

Wolfgang Lukschy (Peter Blackburn)

Edith Schultze-Westrum (Mrs. Hudson)

Bernard Lajarrige (Inspector French)


Director: Terence Fisher

Production company: Constantin Film


Based on: The Valley of Fear by Sir Arthur Conan Doyle


Wikipedia page

(IMDb page)


Watch on Dailymotion

(watched on Tubi)



Setting/Aesthetic/Feel: 3/5

The film seems to be a hodgepodge of settings. 221B Baker Street is victorian and accurate to the books; but the cars are 1920s and Ellen Blackburn feels so 1960s that she jars me every time I look at her. I mean, her hair and makeup is SO not 1890s or even 1920s England. The Egyptian archaeology, though, is accurate to the 1890s. Overall, I don’t mind the anachronistic cars but Ellen Blackburn really bugs me. 


Characters: 5/5

I’ve mentioned before that Ronald Howard, Basil Rathbone, and Arthur Wontner were excellent Sherlocks; I don’t retract that. I think they all did a different side of Holmes. Howard, for instance, shows the human, friendly, humorous, deliberate, eccentric Holmes that Watson knows as a friend; Rathbone, on the other hand, focusses on Holmes as the brilliant detective he is on cases; while Wontner is the cool, incisive, dry, very intellectual Holmes most people saw. As for Lee, he says it himself: “I tried to play him really as he was written, as a very intolerant, argumentative, difficult man.” Even physically, the four men represent a different side of Holmes, and I think they were all equally fantastic. 


Thorley Walters reminded me a lot of Nigel Bruce, in that he played stupid comedic sidekick instead of a real Watson. In my opinion, Ian Fleming was the best of the four. Howard Marion-Crawford was second best because he matches Ronald Howard’s energy so well. But Walters isn’t all that bad, all things considered. 


Finally, Hans Söhnker was a great Moriarty. He played the polite, intellectual professor and the terrifying master criminal equally well. And Hans Nielsen/Inspector Cooper was a satisfactorily stupid Scotland Yard detective. 


As for Peter Blackburn, he was nothing like Douglas from Valley of Fear, nor were Ellen and Paul anything like Barker and Mrs. Douglas. They were not very interesting characters at all and I liked none of them. 


Plot: 5/5

This is an involved and long film, unlike the Howard/Rathbone/Wontner films. The story begins with a drowned man and ends with the downfall of Moriarty. There’s lots of things pulled from various Sherlock books, such as Holmes disguising himself as a sailor, Jenkins giving underground information, the argument about professor Moriarty with the inspector, and Holmes’ claim that he lacks imagination, as well as the usual 221B Baker Street conversations where Holmes slowly spells out the beginning of the investigation to Watson. I could have done without the visit to the pub; but the section taken from Valley of Fear is quite fun, if very different from the book. The car accident and Holmes’ sneaking into the professor’s study is very enjoyable, and I love Homes & Moriarty’s nighttime conversation where the professor tries to convince Holmes to join him. Lee is such a fantastic Holmes—did I mention that?! And Walters as Watson really adds a lot of comedic factor. Finally, the sewer escapade and retrieval of the necklace is AWESOME and the ending is super cool. I’ve watched this film many times now and I really enjoy it so much despite its flaws. It has some excellent humorous one-liners—like really excellent. Also, the whole thing about the Times was EXCELLENT. Such a great thread and really woven through the film.


Some of my favourite quotes in here were... 


Cooper: I think it might interest you to learn that Professor Moriarty happens to be on the list this year of those to be knighted. Would you accuse Sir James Moriarty of murder, Mr. Holmes?

Sherlock: It would give me the very greatest pleasure, Inspector, to see the knight hanged


Sherlock: *reading from newspaper*Two English engineers, named Harrisson and Samuels, have been arrested. A third, Peter Blackburn, has disappeared at the same time as a casket of gold and precious stones containing a golden necklace which belonged to Cleopatra herself. Watson, we have to prevent another murder!

Watson: Holmes, I just don’t know what you’re talking about.


Sherlock: Be careful, Watson, don’t spoil the footprints. Leave that to the Inspector. 


Sherlock: My dear Inspector, Blackburn had a secret. Moriarty wanted it, and when he’d gotten it, he had him murdered. 

Cooper: Do you know the secret, Holmes?

Sherlock: Naturally, I read the Times


Moriarty: *proposing a partnership* Let’s say £6000 per annum and, naturally, a share of the profits.

Sherlock: In my opinion, murder is not profitable. 


Romance: 2/5

Ellen & Paul’s romance is bleh.  


Content: 2/5 (high)

Drinking, smoking; language (d**n); in the pub a woman in a low-necked dress flirts with Watson & physically fawns over him in spite of his claim that he’s married; Ellen & Paul are in love & touching/kissing despite her being married; one shot where Ellen is in an EXCESSIVELY low-necked nightgown. Also a scene where a man licks the blood off his wound which I find really gross. 


Violence: 4/5 (low)

Lots of fighting & killing but most of it off-screen.


Overall: 4.5/5

Yes, there are flaws to this production and it’s not the best film. But Christopher Lee and Hans Söhnker make it a fantastic addition to the classic Holmes films and I personally really love it. 

25 December 2022

“A Charlie Brown Christmas” (1965)

A Charlie Brown Christmas


Brief Description:

It’s Christmastime, and Charlie Brown is depressed! Lucy the Psychiatric has a solution: become director of the Christmas play! But the commercialism of Christmas only depresses Charlie Brown more. Will a little half-dead sapling reignite everyone’s Christmas spirit? 

(possibly written by me, possibly taken from Archive, IMDb, or Wikipedia and edited by me. I forget)


Date: 1965

Genre: American family animated Christmas comedy TV special

Running time: 25 minutes


Cast: 

Peter Robbins (Charlie Brown)

Christopher Shea (Linus)

Tracy Stratford (Lucy)

Cathy Steinberg (Sally)

Chris Doran (Schroeder & Shermy)

Geoffrey Orstein (Pig-Pen)

Sally Dryer (Violet)

Anne Altieri (Frieda)

Bill Melendez (Snoopy)

Karen Mendelson (Patty)


Director: Bill Melendez

Production company: Lee Mendelson Film Productions & Bill Melendez Productions


Based on: Peanuts by Charles M. Schulz


Wikipedia page


Watch on Archive



Setting/Aesthetic/Feel: 2/5

I’m not a fan of the Peanuts aesthetic/setting in films. It’s fine in the cartoons, but too little for a film in my opinion. 


Characters: 3/5

Charlie Brown is depressive, Lucy is irritating, Sally is kinda cute, Linus is too, and the rest are meh. 


Plot: 3/5

The plot is super simple and straightforwards, not bad.


Theme/Message/Topics: 4/5

It’s not very loud, but I do enjoy the message of “what Christmas is all about” despite the commercialism and the ending of Hark! the Herald Angels Sing wrap it up perfectly. 


Content: 5/5

Some euphemisms and music I don’t personally approve of.


Overall: 3/5

It’s a cute film with a great message, and I can see why people love it, and it’s a classic for a reason. It’s just not really my fav. But for the fun of it, I’ll probably rewatch it again. 

“Andy Griffith: The Christmas Story” (1960)

The Christmas Story 


Brief Description:

Scrooge-like businessman Ben Weaver wants Sam Muggins locked up for moonshining, against Andy’s wishes and foiling Barney’s plans for the Christmas party. Knowing Ben will cause them a heap of political trouble if they go against him, Andy brings the party to the station. As Ben hangs around keeping his eye on the place as he promised, will his disgust turn to something else, or can the Christmas Spirit really not touch him at all? 

(possibly written by me, possibly taken from IMDb or somewhere online)


Date: 1960

Genre: American Christmas comedy family TV episode  

Running time: 26 minutes 


Cast: 

Andy Griffith (Andy)

Ron Howard (Opie) 

Don Knotts (Barney)

Frances Bavier (Aunt Bee)

Will Wright (Ben)

Sam Edwards (Sam)

Margaret Kerry (Bess)

Elinor Donahue (Ellie)


Director: Bob Sweeney

Production company: Mayberry Enterprises


IMDb page


Watch on DailyMotion


Setting/Aesthetic/Feel: 5/5

I love the small-town, countryside feel of the Andy Griffith show. <3 ’Nough said. 


Characters: 5/5

Humorous, caring Andy; hilarious Barney; helpless Sam; cranky Ben; and sweet Bess make for a wonderful cast of characters, especially aided by the cute children and dear Aunt Bee. <3


Plot: 5/5; Theme/Message/Topics: 5/5

I can’t give much away, but this has slight Christmas Carol feels, which is very enjoyable, and also includes a lovely rendition of Away in a Manger. <3 Humour and sweetness and Christmassy feels are all present! My only objection is, again, I wish there was more Christ and less Claus. 


Overall: 5/5

The perfect Christmas Eve or Christmas morning episode! 

14 December 2022

“Frosty the Snowman” (1969)

Frosty the Snowman


Brief Description:

On Christmas Eve, a terrible magician named Professor Hinkle is called to the schoolhouse to perform for the class Christmas party, but fails. After, the children go out to play in the snow where they build a snowman and name him Frosty. Suddenly, Hinkle's rabbit, Hocus Pocus, hops outside and a gust of wind blows the hat onto Frosty, bringing him to life.

(taken from Wikipedia and edited by me)


Date: 1969

Genre: American family animated Christmas TV special

Running time: 25 minutes 

Director: Arthur Rankin Jr. & Jules Bass

Production company: Rankin/Bass Productions


Based on: Frosty the Snowman by Steve Nelson & Jack Rollins


Wikipedia page


DNF. I was unaware this was about magic and Santa Claus. 

4 December 2022

“How the Grinch Stole Christmas” (1966)

How the Grinch Stole Christmas 

Also known as Dr. Seuss’ How the Grinch Stole Christmas!


Brief Description:

The Grinch is a surly asocial green creature with a heart “two sizes too small” who lives alone in a cave atop Mt. Crumpit, located above the village of Whoville. He especially hates Christmas and has always been annoyed by the town's Christmas celebrations. One Christmas Eve, he finally decides to stop Christmas Day from coming to Whoville by disguising himself as Santa Claus, his dog Max as a reindeer and, in a reversal of Santa's visit, stealing all presents, decorations, and symbols of Christmas. Once loaded, he plans on dumping the bags of stolen goods…
(possibly written by me, possibly taken from Tubi, IMDb, or Wikipedia and edited by me. I forget)


Date: 1966

Genre: American Christmas family comedy

Running time: 25 minutes 


Cast: 

Boris Karloff (Grinch / Narrator)
June Foray (Cindy-Lou)
Dallas McKennon (Max)
Thurl Ravenscroft (Singer)

Director: Ben Washam & Chuck Jones

Production company: MGM Television


Based on: How the Grinch Stole Christmas! by Dr. Seuss


Wikipedia page


Watch on Archive



Setting/Aesthetic/Feel: 2/5

I am not a fan of dull-bright, papery, over-colourful aesthetics. They're okay in a book—I love Dr. Seuss—but too much on screen.


Characters: 3/5

I hate the Grinch, okay?? He's just abusive towards that poor dog and that was all I could focus on. He’s so not like that in the book! Max was cute and pathetic and funny, though. 


Plot: 4/5

Very similar to the book, which I appreciated. I just hated actually seeing the Grinch at his two-sizes-too-small self. 


Theme/Message/Topics: 4/5

I liked the theme (same as the book) and seeing how the Grinch changed drastically after his heart sizing up.


Content: 4/5 (low)

As I mentioned, the Grinch was very abusive to his dog. The poor thing was always running away, trembling, cringing. It bothered me very much. 


Violence: 4/5 (low)

My siblings thought all the Max antics were hilarious and weren’t bothered by the violence. 


Overall: 3/5

I love the book. I was not a fan of the film and don’t plan to watch it again. Sorry. 🤷🏻‍♀️


EDIT: I may, after all, watch it again. Took me 2 tries to like the book. The TV special deserves the same second chance. Expect an update Christmas 2023!