Showing posts with label high violence. Show all posts
Showing posts with label high violence. Show all posts

14 January 2026

“The Tenant of Wildfell Hall” (1996)

The Tenant of Wildfell Hall

Brief Description:

A mysterious young woman arrives at Wildfell Hall, an old house of the Elizabethan era, with a young son. She is determined to lead an independent existence, but her new neighbours do not want to leave her alone. Only one of them, a young farmer, Gilbert Markham, succeeds in finding her secrets.

(from Wikipedia)


Date: 1996

Genre: period drama television serial adaptation

Running time: 2 hours 42 minutes (3 episodes)


Cast: 

Toby Stephens – Gilbert Markham

Tara Fitzgerald – Helen Graham Huntingdon

Rupert Graves – Arthur Huntington

Sarah Badel – Rachel

Jackson Leach – Arthur Huntington Jr.

Sean Gallagher – Walter Hargrave

Jonathan Cake – Ralph Hattersley

Joe Absolom – Fergus Markham

Kenneth Cranham – Reverend Millward

Pam Ferris – Mrs. Markham

Cathy Murphy – Miss Myers

Paloma Baeza – Rose Markham

Aran Bell – Richard Wilson

Miranda Pleasence – Eliza Millward

James Purefoy – Frederick Lawrence

Kim Durham – Benson

Dominic Rowan – Lord Lowborough

Beatie Edney – Annabella Wilmot, Lady Lowborough

Janet Dale – Mrs. Wilson

Susannah Wise – Millicent Hargrave

Karen Westwood – Jane Wilson


Director: Mike Barker

Production company: BBC & WGBH


Based on: The Tenant of Wildfell Hall by Anne Brontë


Wikipedia page


Watch on Archive

(watched on Tubi)


Setting/Aesthetic/Feel: 4/5

I'm just a beginner when it comes to period dramas, so I don't have very much to compare this to. I was not a fan of the vocalizing in the beginning and the end, which felt super modern; but I was very impressed by the clothes and hairstyles, which looked pretty accurate to me. Of course I also loved the aesthetics and settings... overall, I was pretty satisfied. I loved the dresses, anyways 😉 


Characters: 5/5

Judging purely off of looks: I think Tara Fitzgerald was a pretty good Helen. It's been a while since I read the book (only did so once) but I really liked how innocent and sweet her face looked. Graves was not as handsome as I thought Huntingdon would look, but I have no other quibbles. Stephens was a FANTASTIC Gilbert, I thought—looked like him and talked like him. And little Arthur was just cute :)


Plot: 4/5

I have mixed feelings on the plot. While they stuck pretty well to the actual story (as far as I recall; as I said, I only read the book once) they did snuck some extra themes in and remove the christianity. More on that later! It was, as expected, heavy and a little violent, dealing as it does with domestic violence and adultery; and I HATED the minister (I can't recall if I did in the book, or if this was exaggerated in the story). I did enjoy the however-will-they-get-together aspect again, anyways. 


Theme/Message/Topics: 4/5

While Huntingdon still complains bitterly of Helen's morality, and she does object to his vices, it came across as more of a "she's just a good person" and much less "the power of Christ in her." She never explained why she chose to do these things, as she does in the book, nor ever discussed salvation with him (again, like the book) though he does complain of going to hell. The other theme they worked in was much more domestic violence. I can't recall how much physical violence is hinted at or plays on-screen in the book, but in this film Huntingdon is much more verbally and even occasionally physically abusive, and there's rarely a scene where he isn't screaming at Helen once they're married. They also added a good bit of sexual assault. I would have preferred to see it implied and not played out; but I understand it's something important to talk about and probably happened in the book, and it's certainly a part of domestic violence. 


Romance: 2/5 (high)

As mentioned before, there are several scenes of Huntingdon forcing himself on Helen in episode 2. 1 scene happens in bed; in another, he throws her to the floor in a room; and then there are multiple scenes where he forces a kiss. There's also a scene where a friend of his forces kisses on her in episode 3. In episode 2, as well, you get a very wet kiss scene between Huntingdon and Helen before they're married. Later, after the wedding, comes a scene where he kisses her bare stomach and begins to undress her while talking of her beauty, immediately following which comes a scene where they're in bed together, quite bare, discussing how Huntingdon slept with a married woman. Later on, still in episode 2, there's a somewhat graphic birthing scene. Finally, in episode 2 or 3 (I forget) there's a scene where Huntingdon makes out with a friend's wife, but the camera pans quickly enough that all you see is them kissing and him shoving her to the wall (you can hear a few sounds for a few seconds after). Personally, I'm not sure if episode 2 is absolutely necessary to watch as I already know the plot of the book; but definitely if I rewatch it I would skip several scenes. Not just fast-forward, but actually physically skip. 😆 There's 2 kisses between Gilbert and Helen (episodes 1&3) but they're not very intense. 


Content: 2/5 (high)

Apart from everything else mentioned, there's a lot of drinking and drunk people, possible 2-3 instances of swearing; and a very nasty preacher who in one scene preaches a violent sermon, implied to be against Helen, as the townsfolk are convinced she's having an affair. (Spoiler: the man who visits her at bight is her brother, and Helen is not one bit unfaithful.) Huntingdon wishes she was having an affair later on. He becomes ill in episode 3 and coughs blood; his eye bleeds in a certain shot. In another scene, he paints blood from a dead bird on his son and sends him to see Helen; Arthur Jr. then sees a canary in a cage and for one scene hurts it (the bird is seen dead shortly after).


Violence: 2/5 (medium)

Apart from everything else mentioned, there's a scene where Gilbert fights Helen's brother and cuts him about the face with a riding crop; also a scene where one of Huntingdon's friends starts to get physically abusive with his wife but Helen speaks up and the men ask him to stop, which he does. 


Overall: 4/5

Overall, it's definitely for ages 18+ and not to be watched lightly, which I already suspected. As I mentioned, I'd skip some scenes, but I think I'd watch this again. I did enjoy a lot of it and it certainly makes me want to reread the book, which is totally fantastic. (You can read my review of that here.)

7 November 2022

“Union Station” (1950)

 Union Station


Brief Description:
When a young secretary alerts police about two shady characters on her train, they discover the men have kidnapped her employer’s blind daughter. The father is convinced to reluctantly cooperate with police. But the ringleader will do anything to get his money and keep his freedom…
(probably written by me, possibly taken from Tubi, IMDb, or Wikipedia and edited by me)

Date: 1950 
Genre: American mystery film noir crime drama romance thriller/suspense
Running time: 1 hour 20 minutes

Cast: 
William Holden (Calhoun)
Nancy Olson (Joyce)
Barry Fitzgerald (Donnelly)
Lyle Bettger (Beacom)
Jan Sterling (Marge)
Allene Roberts (Lorna)
Herbert Heyes (Murchison)

Director: Rudolph Maté
Production company: Paramount Pictures

Based on: Nightmare in Manhattan by Thomas Walsh



Setting/Aesthetic/Feel: 5/5

The railway station setting was unique and very enjoyable as well as very realistic. I also appreciated the underground aspect! And the aesthetic was awesome—high heels, trench coats, soft hats, round curls… From the setting to the dialogue to the clothes to the actions, this had a very 1940s/1950s feel which I absolutely loved


Characters: 5/5

I really loved how although there were many characters, they all had their own personalities, even the many and hardly seen policeman! (And there were so many interesting, good-looking faces… ;P) I liked Fay, rough and gruff but stepping in to save Joyce. I hated Beacom, who struck me as the coldest villains I have ever seen on screen—not senselessly cruel, deliberately and uncaringly so. I loved the little Irish inspector, with his thick accent, his grandfatherly ways, and his enigmatic smile. I really liked how Joyce wasn’t exactly pretty, nor Calhoun handsome (unusual for this era, in my opinion) and how their personalities meshed—she, wearing her large heart on her sleeve and Calhoun hiding his deep beneath a rather indifferent and job-centred exterior. And although Marge was the stereotypical flippant, worldly-wise blonde, I liked how her script was flipped at the end.


Plot: 5/5

The plot kept me nailed to my computer screen. I felt like I had been transferred directly into the story and I was just as anxious to see if the bad guys were caught and the girl was okay. The storyline only covers about 2-4 days, but there’s a lot packed into there and it made the story seem that much more real (lots of films solve the mystery in 1-2 days or have a lot more incidents happen, while this one focussed solely on the kidnapping). 


Romance: 5/5

It was super cute, even if it was a tiny thread, and I loved that it was a sort of kind-enemies-to-lovers by which both improved the other and learned something good. And there was no stereotypical end kiss—just some sweet, funny words. 


Theme/Message/Topics: 5/5

Rather an unusual theme, but basically one about not letting your job consume you, and also about what it’s like for policemen—the cost of their job both for their families and for their hearts.


Content: 5/5 (low)

A few shots of drinking alcohol. 


Violence: 2/5 (high)

In two scenes, policemen knocked one of the bad guys around to elicit a confession and finally pretended to throw him under a moving train (which worked). Beacom gets physically aggressive with the kidnapped girl—shaking, dragging, and pushing, as well as slapping her off-screen; she does a lot of crying and screaming. A man is trampled to death by cows (non-graphic); two people are shot to death (non-graphic); a gunfight ends in a death (non-graphic).


Overall: 5/5

Besides all the on-screen violence, which I could have very well done without, this was all I ask for in a vintage mystery film—vibrant characters, a good storyline, lots of suspense, no content, sweet romance, and great vintage feels. I look forwards to watching it again!