Showing posts with label 1970s. Show all posts
Showing posts with label 1970s. Show all posts

12 March 2026

“Treasure Island” (1972)

Treasure Island 


Brief Description:

Young Jim Hawkins has an unforgettable encounter with pirate Captain Long John Silver and his murderous mates.


Date: 1972

Genre: historical adventure film

Running time: 1 hour 34 minutes 


Cast: 

Orson Welles as Long John Silver

Kim Burfield as Jim Hawkins

Lionel Stander as Billy Bones

Walter Slezak as Squire Trelawney

Ángel del Pozo as Doctor Livesey

Rik Battaglia as Captain Smollett

Jean Lefebvre as Ben Gunn

Maria Rohm as Mrs. Hawkins

Paul Muller as Blind Pew

Michel Garland as George Merry

Aldo Sambrell as Israel Hands


Director: John Hough

Production company: National General Pictures


Based on: Treasure Island by Robert Louis Stevenson


Wikipedia page


Setting/Aesthetic/Feel: 4/5

Having loved the book, I was eager to try this film and see what I thought of it. The aesthetic and setting was on point—I really enjoyed the island and the ship! 


Characters: 4/5

Jim Hawkins was adorable (I hadn't realized what a little kid he was!). I loved Dr. Livesay in the book, and I loved him here. I liked the Squire most of the time, though he also drove me crazy; but I was surprised by how much I loved the captain! As for Silver, I struggled a lot. Though Tubi has captions, they weren't very good, and I only got about 1 in 10 words he said thanks to his mumbling, so I missed out on a good deal since he's the main character. Ben Gumm was well done though, and so were the other sailors. 


Plot: 4/5

I honestly don't remember the book's plot very well, but what little I did meshed well with the film's plot. I really enjoyed the adventure/swashbuckling aspect and it certainly had my adrenaline and my heart going. I had to take a few breaks towards the end!! 


Content: 3/5 (medium)

Some language; drinking.


Violence: 3/5 (medium)

On-screen murder; habitual violence. 


Overall: 4/5

While probably okay for older kids, it's not quite as family friendly as I expected. But I enjoyed it; it made me want to reread the book; and I'm sure I will rewatch this! 

7 February 2026

“The Aristocats” (1970)

The Aristocats

Brief Description:

With the help of a smooth talking tomcat, a family of Parisian felines set to inherit a fortune from their owner try to make it back home after a jealous butler kidnaps them and leaves them in the country.

(from IMDb)

Date: 1970

Genre: American animated musical comedy film

Running time: 1 hour 19 minutes


Cast: 

Phil Harris: O'Malley

Eva Gabor & Robie Lester: Duchesse

Gary Dubin: Toulouse

Liz English: Marie

Dean Clark: Berlioz

Sterling Holloway: Roquefort

Scatman Crothers: Scat Cat

Paul Winchell: Shun Gon

Lord Tim Hudson: Hit Cat

Vito Scotti: Peppo

Thurl Ravenscroft: Billy Boss

Nancy Kulp & Ruth Buzzi: Frou-Frou

Pat Buttram: Napoleon

George Lindsey: Lafayette

Hermione Baddeley: Madame

Charles Lane: Georges

Roddy Maude-Roxby: Edgar

Monica Evans: Abigail

Carole Shelley: Amelia

Bill Thompson: Uncle Waldo

Peter Renaday: French Milkman, Le Petit Café Cook, Truck Movers


Director: Wolfgang Reitherman

Production company: Walt Disney Productions


Wikipedia page


Watch on Archive



Setting/Aesthetic/Feel: 3/5

Okay, I know this is a little nitpicky, but... y'all. This is Paris. Why are Madame and Edgar (and Georges!!) English? Why is Duchess the only one with an accent, and why is it more German than French? Why are the hounds Southerners? Why do people even pronounce "le petit café" as "petite"? I love the scenery, but I can't take the dialogue, lol. 


Characters: 3.5/5

Roquefort is my favourite—he's so sweet. I'm not a fan of O'Malley; he's such a flatterer and so casual. Duchess and the kittens are cute though, and as much as I fundamentally object to them given the setting, the dogs are hilarious! 


Plot: 4/5

I enjoy the whole adventure/danger part of the plot, and the humour following Edgar's escapades. 


Romance: 4/5

O'Malley and Duchess are kinda cute, and I like how he steps up as a father for the kittens. 


Content: 4/5 (low)

Not a fan of the drunken uncle, and I don't particularly care for the music sessions either. 


Violence: 4/5 (low)

Mild slapstick violence.


Overall: 3.5/5

It's just not my favourite, to be honest. 🤷🏻‍♀️

14 September 2023

“Robin Hood” (1973)

Robin Hood


Brief Description:

Based on the English folktale of the same name, the story follows the adventures of Robin Hood, Little John, and the inhabitants of Nottingham as they fight against the excessive taxation of Prince John, and Robin Hood wins the hand of Maid Marian.

(from Wikipedia)


Date: 1973

Genre: American animated musical adventure comedy family film

Running time: 1 hour 23 minutes


Cast: 

Brian Bedford (Robin Hood)

Phil Harris (Little John)

Andy Devine (Friar Tuck)

Roger Miller (Alan-a-Dale)

Monica Evans (Maid Marian)

Carole Shelley (Lady Kluck)

Peter Ustinov (Prince John / King Richard)

Terry Thomas (Sir Hiss)

Pat Buttram (the Sheriff of Nottingham)

George Lindsey (Trigger)

Ken Curtis (Nutsy)

Candy Candido (Captain of the Royal Guard)

Billy Whitaker (Skippy)

Dana Laurita (Sis)

Dori Whitaker (Tagalong)

Richie Sanders (Toby)

John Fiedler (Sexton)

Barbara Luddy (Sexton’s wife / Mrs. Rabbit)

J. Pat O’Malley (Otto)


Director: Wolfgang Reitherman

Production company: Walt Disney Productions


Based on: The legends of Robin Hood


Wikipedia page


Watch on Archive


Setting/Aesthetic/Feel: 4/5

So, this is NOT an accurate Robin Hood retelling. It’s a comedy. Once you realize that, it’s much more smooth sailing. XD But it has a cute Disney feel/aesthetic to it, and I like it! 


Characters: 5/5

I love how every character’s accent and voice fits their personality SO well. Robin is, of course, Robin Hood and wonderful. Little John is about seven hoots and a half. Friar Tuck was actually quite accurate to himself. Alan-a-Dale was a fun character, as was Lady Kluck; and Maid Marian was adorable. John was hilarious, specially paired with Sir Hiss; the Sheriff and his men were great comedic relief. Also, the kids were SO CUTE, and the mice and Otto were lovely village folk. 


Plot: 4/5

For the most part this is a mad screwball. And it’s funny! Even the intro is fun. I’m not a fan of the fortune telling scene (because of Little John… ahem) but the birthday scene is epic and so sweet (I MELTEDDDD), and so is the one in the castle grounds <33 But LJ and Rob are such a great pair; I love most of their scenes ;) The archery scene and subsequent rampage is hilarious! But I can’t love the romantic evening because THAT SONG HAS BEEN USED IN VERBO ADS AND NOW I CANNOT ENJOY IT ANY LONGER!! And The Phony King of England lyrics are great. Absolutely hilarious. Also, the song Not in Nottingham is kinda really heartbreaking and made me cry. All that scene surrounding that is so touching! Anyways, the ending of the film is perfect—heartwarming and hilarious and dramatic all at once—and I loooove it. 


Romance: 5/5

Super small but real cute. :) And I looove the melting of Maid Marian’s face + the waterfall. Super cool artistry. 


Themes/messages/topics: 5/5

It’s a bit buried beneath all the slapstick, quips, and country music, but I love the message. 


Oh, Robin, you risk so much to keep our hopes alive.


The theme of empty souls through loss of hope, and finding happiness again, is particularly poignant to me, as someone who struggles with depression and hopelessness, and sees it a lot in the world.


Content: 4/5 (low)

Euphemisms. Country music, etc. Lady Kluck’s underpants are shown briefly in a chase scene, and her dress is clearly optional, because it’s always flying up and around. (As my sister says, the girls are always showing their bloomers in this film when they hitch up their skirts!) The biggest thing that bothers me is the scene where John and Robin disguise themselves as women fortune tellers, though no real fortunetelling is done. John gains attraction because of how buxom he is and he stores things in his bodice several times, and he flirts with the guards. 


Violence: 5/5 (low)

There’s mild violence but it's so slapstick it doesn’t feel violent. XD 


Overall: 4.5/5

Overall, this is a very amusing film, and I do love the characters. It’s not my favourite, but I really, really enjoy it. <3 

24 December 2022

“A Christmas Carol” (1971)

A Christmas Carol 


Brief Description:
On Christmas Eve, tight-fisted businessman Ebenezer Scrooge is visited by the Spirit of Christmas Past, the Spirit of Christmas Present, and the Spirit of Christmas Yet to Come. Is there any chance his frozen old heart will change, and that he can escape the frightful destiny that awaits him? 

(written by me)


Date: 1971

Genre: British Christmas drama fantasy family film animation

Running time: 25 minutes


Cast: 

Alastair Sim (Scrooge)

Michael Redgrave (Narrator)

Michael Hordern (Marley)

Diana Quick (Ghost of Christmas Past)

Felix Felton (Ghost of Christmas Present)

Melvyn Hayes (Cratchit)

Joan Sims (Mrs. Cratchit)

Paul Whitsun-Jones (Fezziwig / Old Joe)

David Tate (Fred/Charity Man)

Annie West (Belle)

Mary Ellen Ray (Mrs. Dilber)

Alexander Williams (Tiny Tim)


Director: Richard Williams

Production company: Richard Williams Productions


Based on: A Christmas Carol by Charles Dickens


Wikipedia page


Watch on YouTube


Setting/Aesthetic/Feel: 4/5

As this was an animation, of course it didn’t have the same feel as a “living” production would have; but it was pretty good. It had a very interesting touch unlike any other animation I have seen… I can’t really put my finger on it, but I quite liked it. 


Characters: 5/5

The characters were all well done. Scrooge was very Scrooge-like, Crachit was Crachit, Fred was Fred, and so forth. The three spirits were particularly well done! Marley, however, was this weird monster-skeleton apparition, and so were the others “ghosts” that Scrooge saw filling the air in the seldom-seen scene with the beggar woman and her child. 


Plot: 5/5

The plot aligned well with the book, with a very few slight deviances. I was very happy to see the aforementioned scene with the beggar woman and her child! Also, the addition of God Rest Ye Merry, Gentlemen at the beginning and end was a masterful touch—gave a joyful twist to the message (as opposed to a holy/reverent one with Hark! the Herald Angel Sings, like the 1938) and was a nice nod to the book.


Overall: 4.5/5

These reviews are getting worse and worse, for which I apologize and promise better ones soon. In the meantime, this was another of my favourite Christmas Carol adaptations and very different from the 1969, which was quite nice.

6 December 2022

“The Berenstain Bears’ Christmas Tree” (1979)

The Berenstain Bears Christmas Tree 


Brief Description:

It's Christmas Eve in Bear Country and the Bear Family has everything but a Christmas Tree! Papa Bear and the cubs set out on an adventure to find the perfect Christmas Tree but run into some trouble.

(from YouTube)


Date: 1979

Genre: American family Christmas film

Running time: 25 minutes


Cast: 

Ron McLarty (Papa / Narrator)
Gabriela Glatzer (Sister)
Jonathan Lewis (Brother)
Pat Lysinger (Mama)


Director: Mordicai Gerstein

Production company: Perpetual Motion Pictures & The Joseph Cates Company


Based on: the Berenstain Bears series by Stan & Jan Berenstain


Wikipedia page 


Watch on YouTube



Setting/Aesthetic/Feel: 2/5

Again, it’s the old vintage dull paper feel which I’m not a super big fan of. Also, it’s the old Bernstein bears so everything looks silly and super irrealistic. I didn’t hate it—I just don’t love it. 


Characters: 2/5

Sister & Brother were funny, but Papa was an idiot, of course. The other animals were kinda cute or funny though. 


Plot: 1/5

The whole point of the film was to show Papa was stupid and should obey Mama. Not a fan. I did enjoy seeing the tribulations the bears went through to find a good tree, and the rhyming narration got kinda fun.  


Theme/Message/Topics: 2/5

There was a heavy message of “Christmas is about others”… not exactly the whole message but better than I expected. 


Overall: 2/5

Just not a fan, and feel like I wasted my time.